PolitiCook.net

Politics, politics!

Written by Asinus Asinum Fricat on May 16, 2008 – 5:21 pm -

Senator Barack Obama hit back at President Bush today during a speech in Watertown, South Dakota for “dishonest and divisive” comments made by the president in Israel, which inferred that the presumed Democratic presidential nominee’s calls for talks with Iranian officials resembled appeasement with the enemy.

“The president did something that presidents don’t do,” Obama said, charging that Bush’s words targeted other Democrats, as well. “He said that we were appeasers no different than those that appeased Adolf Hitler.”

“That’s exactly the kind of appalling attack that’s divided our country and alienates us from the rest of the world,” Obama added, before taking aim at McCain also for also “embracing Bush’s comments.”

Obama said, “That’s the kind of hypocrisy that we’ve been seeing in our foreign policy, the kind of fear-peddling, fear mongering that has prevented us from actually making us safer,” adding that McCain had a “naive and irresponsible belief that tough talk from Washington will somehow cause Iran to give up it’s nuclear program and support for terrorism.

Obama also blasted McCain for linking him to Hamas, and noted that he has never called for talks with Hamas leaders, while the Republican presidential candidate once had. The Illinois senator challenged Bush and McCain to take him on anytime on the question of patriotism, and noted the Iraq war’s effect on the global war on terror.

“If George Bush and John McCain want to have a debate on protecting America, that’s a debate I’ll be glad to have happen,” Obama said.

Fox commentators noted that Obama was sporting a flag pin during his speech. Ouch!

In response, a McCain spokesman told Fox that Obama’s speech was a “hysterical” attempt to pretend he’s not liberal.

The White House has denied that Bush was referring to Democrats in his speech, but reporters have noted that behind the scenes before Bush spoke staffers had made references, and that it wasn’t until after Democrats loudly condemned the president for taking the presidential race to a foreign land that the denials were issued. In short order, the controversy spilled across the presidential campaign. John McCain, the Republican nominee in waiting, said Obama was showing “naivete and inexperience and lack of judgment” in his willingness to meet with U.S. foes. Yeah, right! Today, someone unearthed a video of McCain saying he’d meet with senior members of Hamas! Go to Huffpo and check it out!

Hillary Rodham Clinton then called Bush’s original comments “offensive and outrageous, especially in light of his failures in foreign policy.” As the workday began stateside, Bush gave a speech to Israel’s Knesset in which he spoke of the president of Iran, who has called for the destruction of the U.S. ally. Then, the president said: “Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is - the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history,” Bush added.

With the president abroad and those seeking to succeed him campaigning at home, the transcontinental tiff signaled the early direction of the general election. Bush seemed to assume the traditional lame-duck presidential role in trying to help the Republican nominee-in-waiting, and Obama tried to maneuver for advantage - and to show strength - while on the cusp of clinching the Democratic nomination.

McCain played his political role as well in tandem with Obama, notable for two White House hopefuls who are campaigning for a bipartisan governing approach free of the often divisive discourse in Washington.

By tradition, partisan politics comes to a halt when a U.S. president is on foreign soil, and Bush’s remarks led Obama to quickly cry foul. The first-term Illinois senator responded to the comments as if they were criticism of his position that as president he would be willing to personally meet with Iran’s leaders and those of other regimes the United States has deemed rogue.

“It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel’s independence to launch a false political attack,” Obama said in a statement his aides distributed. “George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the president’s extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel.

In turn, White House press secretary Dana Perino denied that the Knesset remark was aimed at Obama. In fact, the language is fairly typical for Bush speeches, and Gordon Johndroe, a national security spokesman for the president, said Bush was referring to “a wide range of people who have talked to or suggested we talk to Hamas, Hezbollah or their state sponsors” over a long period of time. Even as the White House said Bush meant no dig at the Democrat, Perino couldn’t resist the opportunity to get in a small one.

“I understand when you’re running for office you sometimes think the world revolves around you. That is not always true. And it is not true in this case,” she said.

Meanwhile, in Columbus, Ohio, McCain said he took the White House at its word, but then he weighed into the spat himself, saying:

“This does bring up an issue that we will be discussing with the American people, and that is, why does Barack Obama, Senator Obama, want to sit down with a state sponsor of terrorism?”

Asked if Obama was an appeaser, McCain said Obama must explain why he wants to talk with leaders like Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and added that Obama’s position was a serious error.

“It shows naivete and inexperience and lack of judgment to say that he wants to sit down across the table from an individual who leads a country that says Israel is a stinking corpse, that is dedicated to the extinction of the state of Israel. My question is, what does he want to talk about?”

Clinton, campaigning in South Dakota in advance of a June 3 Democratic primary, said Bush’s statement had “no place in any presidential address. I have differences with Senator Obama on certain foreign policy matters, but I think we are united in our opposition to the Bush policies and to the continuation of those policies by Senator McCain.” Clinton has criticized Obama in the past for his pledge to meet with prominent adversaries of the United States without precondition.

By criticizing Bush, Obama sent a signal that he’s ready to take on the sitting president and the incumbent party - and tried to counter the notion that Clinton would be the stronger Democratic general election candidate. Democrats also are working to link the unpopular Bush to McCain at every turn as the public craves change, and even if it wasn’t directed at Obama, Bush’s remark gave Democrats an opening to claim more of the same.

“It is time to turn the page on eight years of policies that have strengthened Iran and failed to secure America or our ally Israel,” Obama said in his statement. “Instead of tough talk and no action, we need to do what (Presidents) Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan did and use all elements of American power - including tough, principled, and direct diplomacy - to pressure countries like Iran and Syria.”

For their part, McCain and Republicans increasingly see Obama as their November rival and have been taking every opportunity to raise questions about his readiness to be a wartime commander in chief. The GOP also hopes to make national security - historically a Republican strength - a focus of the campaign when the political terrain favors Democrats.

Tags: GW Bush, Obama, Politics, US Presidency
Posted in Diaries |