Chemical Weapons III. How Nerve agents work

Written by Translator on July 19, 2008 – 7:35 pm -

Crossposted at Dailykos.com

I had a change of plans.  It is easy to understand that materials like chlorine or phosgene, or even mustard agents work because they chemically attack cells, either destroying proteins and lipids, of by corrupting DNA.

Nerve agents work very differently, so this aside may shed some light on how these horrible materials work.  First, some basic physiology.  There are numerous chemical messengers in the body and brain, including dopamine (why people get addicted, but that is another post), norepinephrine, GABA, serotonin, and many others.  This has to with one called acetylcholine.

Here is a structural diagram of acetylcholine.

This neurotransmitter is involved, amongst other things, with voluntary and involuntary muscle movement.  It also has to do with such actions as breathing, secretion of fluids, and eye pupil size.  It is an excititory neurotransmitter, meaning that its presence causes nerves to fire, in contrast to an inhibitory neurotransmitter, where its presence prevents nerves to fire.  This is an extremely important distinction, so please keep it in mind.

Because acetylcholine is an excititory neurotransmitter, it has to be stopped when its job is done.  Animals have an enzyme that does just this, by the tongue twisting name of “acetylcholinesterase”.  This is a large protein, and its sole job is to decompose acetylcholine once it has jumped from one synapse to the other.  This enzyme is present in all of us, and is essential for survival.

Acetylcholinesterase inactivates residual acetylcholine.  Unlike many neurotransmitters, acetylcholine activates nerve transmissions by a brief connection with the receptor on the opposite side of the synapse, then is cast away.  It does bond, but only transiently, before being offcast.  Then the receptor regains its original quaternary structure, and ready to play again.  It is up to acetylcholinesterase to destroy the excess acetylcholine to prevent it from making those nerves fire over and over.

Here is a graphic of synaptic communication.  This one is general:

This does not show acetylcholinesterase.  Acetylcholine is not normally reabsorbed, so the diagram is not completely accurate, but it was the best one that I could find.  Instead of a reuptake pump as in this diagram, acetylcholinesterase degrades acetylcholine into choline and acetate, which are recycled later.

The important part of the diagram is to see that a neurotransmitter has to be expelled from one side of the synapse, and then activate a receptor on the other side.  Most of the time, and in keeping with this diagram, the neurotransmitter is ejected after the receptor is activated, and reabsorbed.  In the case of acetylcholine, it is ejected and destroyed by acetylcholineserase.

Once acetylcholine triggers the receptor, the target organs are activated.  Skeletal muscle contracts, and cardiac muscle relaxes.

The muscle contractions also affect the diaphragm, causing it to seize in a contracted manner.  But our friend acetylcholineserase comes to the rescue by destroying the acetylcholine, preventing it from reactivating the pathway.  Thus our bowels and bladders relax, our muscles relax, and our diaphragm relaxes and allows us to breathe in a big draught of air.

This occurs constantly in the body, regulated by other enzymes and feedback control mechanisms.  This is important, because if your muscles did not not tighten and relax constantly, they would become weak.  If your eyes did not constantly react to light, you would become blind.  If your diaphragm did not contract and relax, you would suffocate.

The nerve agents act by binding to acetylcholinesterase, making it so that it can not do its job.  Acetylcholine accumulates and thus makes the nerves keep on firing, rather than firing once and stopping.  The result is the the skeletal muscles contract and become rigid, while heart action is decreased.  Without immediate medical intervention, death results from a combination of stoppage of breathing due to the diaphragm going into a contracted permanent state and the heart action decreasing and finally stopping.

Large doses of atropine reverse the symptoms, but do not reverse the damage to acetylcholinesterase.  Here is a structural diagram of atropine:

Atropine binds to the acetylcholine receptor without triggering it.  Thus, atropine poisoning results in skeletal muscle relaxation, heart rate increase, and widely dilated pupils.  Many people have been the the eye doctor and had their pupils dilated for an examination.  Thus, the competition between atropine and acetylcholine reverses the symptoms of nerve agent poisoning, but does not cure it.  Over time, the atropine is destroyed by the body and symptoms often reappear, especially after high doses of nerve agents.

The body replenishes its supply of acetylcholinesterase, assuming that one lives, but only very slowly.  Repeated, subclinical doses of nerve agents can reduce levels to the point that another subclinical dose can cause full poisoning symptoms.  People who work around these materials are required to get a baseline acetylcholinesterase measurement, and periodic checks to try to prevent this from happening.

One might guess that a solution would be to regenerate the damaged acetylcholinesterase, and one would have guessed correctly.  That actually cures the condition, rather than just reversing the symptoms.  The drug developed for that is pralidoxime.  Here is the structural formula:

This material is generally used as the chloride (called 2-PAM chloride).  Pralidoxime strips the phosphate from the nerve agent from acetylcholinesterase, reactivating the enzyme and being converted, along with the phosphate fragment of the nerve agent, into relatively inert materials.  The problem is that it works more slowly than atropine, so atropine is essential to preserve life while the pralidoxime takes effect.

Soldiers who are serving is suspected chemical threat areas are issued protective clothing, of which there are several levels depending on the threat assessment.  A respirator is the minimum level of protection, with specially treated HEPA filters and activated carbon.  In military lingo they are called protective masks, since the cover the entire face.  Nerve agents can get into the system from the eyes, and other agents irritate the eyes anyway.  In each mask carrier is what is called a “Mark V” kit, which contains two sets of autoinjectors (think of a adrenaline pen used by people with serious allergies to insect stings.  You just put in on a large muscle, usually your thigh, and it injects a measured dose for you), one set with atropine and the other with pralidoxime.  That way a soldier can medicate himself, since the probability of a medical person reaching her or him before death is very low.  Part of the doctrine is to bend the needle from each injector and hang the injector on the pants leg so when medical help does arrive it is fast to see how much medication has been self administered.

Do not be deceived:  these treatments are far from 100% effective.  Depending on the dose, there may not be enough medication in a Mark V kit to save one, and any delay in administration reduces the chance of recovery.  Part of the reason is that the nerve agent binds with acetylcholinesterase rather weakly at first, but as time passes, stronger bonds develop.  This is called “aging” of the complex, and one it has aged, pralidoxime can not undo the binding.  Agent GD (see previous diary) seems to be the worst for that, meaning that its complexes with acetylcholenesterase ages faster than those of other nerve agents.

In closing, almost everyone here has sprayed insects and seen the convulsions as the muscles contract, and how fast death comes.  The Nazis did some truly horrific experiments way back when by injecting G agents IV into concentration camp inmates.  I have seen films (if anything, the Nazis were hell bent of documentation) where Jewish and Romani (Gypsy) people were given IV doses, and in some cases the muscle contractions were so fast and so powerful the spontaneous compound fractures would occur because the bones could not take the strain caused.  Nice folks, those Nazis.  I do not have a link to those films, and probably would not post it if I did.  There are some pretty gruesome animal study films at the end of the Wikipedia entry for Nerve Agents, but I do not think that I will like those, either.

I will hang around for a while for questions, comments, etc. as is my practice.  I do not diary and leave except under extraordinary circumstances.  Warmest regards, Doc.


Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Diaries |

17 Comments

  • At 2008.07.19 19:42, biscuit said:

    Wow. This is the first diary of yours I’ve seen under the influence of DSL.

    And this I can understand because I have a much stronger background in biology than chemistry.

    I’ll be back in a bit — I’m doing some finish up work outside and priming some old wallpaper before it gets too late - I look forward to reading.

    • At 2008.07.19 19:51, Translator said:

      Thanks. I will be here for a bit. Warmest regards, Doc.

      • At 2008.07.19 20:33, biscuit said:

        Truly evil, evil stuff.

        Do these agents occur naturally? I know pyrethrins are natural compounds, but I’m not sure if their effects are like those of nerve agents - ?

        Surely there are natural compounds that behave like this? It seemed like the mustard gas you described might be a natural compound. Or am I completely misunderstanding “natural” in terms of chemistry?

        I think what I’m really trying to ask is, are there every day things that could have these effects?

        • At 2008.07.19 20:46, Translator said:

          There are some natural products that have similar effects. Physiostygmine comes to mind, and has pretty much the same effect. It comes from the Calabar bean, and is reversible acetylcholinerestase inhibitor. I will try to imbed a structural formula here.

          Mustard agents are completely synthetic, although there are many natural products that poison by alkylation of lipids or DNA. Aflatoxins are one group, as I recall, but that is just off the top of my head.

          There are lots of everyday things that can do that. Almost every insecticide in a acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, but the pyrethrins are not potent against mammals because we have enzymes that neutralize them before they do any damage. Not so for bees and fish; they are very sensitive.

          Certain solvents, like dichloromethane (methylene chloride) are mild alkylating agents, but thousands if not millions, of times less potent than the mustards. I hope that this helped. Warmest regards, Doc.

          • At 2008.07.19 20:50, biscuit said:

            Yes, it does.

            So these nerve agents truly are a human invention. Yikes. Talk about The Machine …

            • At 2008.07.19 20:56, Translator said:

              They were developed in Germany during the run up to World War II. The Nazis were so nervous that they would be reverse engineered and used against them that they brought all of their limited stockpiles into the most secure part of Germany as the Allied invasion picked up momentum. It was after the war was over that we discovered them. Warmest regards, Doc.

      • At 2008.07.19 20:18, drchelo said:

        I think of the action of acetylcholine as a “hit and run” neuro-exciter.
        So many of our anti-hypertensive and other neuromuscular drugs act on neurotransmitters (even calcium channel blockers are neurotransmitters of a sort) that the entire first semester of our medical school pharmacology course was dedicated to the autonomic nervous system and how it worked - and how to manipulate it.
        Fascinating stuff, Translator! Thank you.

        • At 2008.07.19 20:27, Translator said:

          “Hit and run” is a pretty apt description. It is one of only a few that is destroyed rather than pumped back. If I am incorrect, please correct me, but that is my understanding. I do not become offended when the facts contradict my notions. Thanks for reading, and for commenting. Warmest regards, my friend, Doc.

        • At 2008.07.19 20:43, drchelo said:

          No corrections needed, as far as I can see, Translator!
          There is a very interesting book out there (I cannot think of the author’s name - it is in a cardboard box in my storage room) called “The Molecules of Emotion” that is written by a biochemist who spent her professional life studying neurotransmitters and their action in the brain. Such a poetic title!
          But, come to think of it, so much of our body’s chemistry and the way it works really is a work of art…

          • At 2008.07.19 20:48, biscuit said:

            My sister (a nurse) loves that book. She’s very into things occurring at the cellular level.

            She’s also a long time type II diabetic (first diagnosed 10 years ago) who has kept it under control w/o meds, even though her doctor swore to her her pancreas was no longer functional.

            She believes in diabetes as occurring at the level of the cell, and that book really spoke to the way she tries to live her life. Seems to be working for her, too.

            I should read it.

            • At 2008.07.19 20:59, Translator said:

              My dad was Type II as well, and he controlled it pretty well until the cancer got him at 85. Warmest regards, Doc.

            • At 2008.07.19 20:58, Translator said:

              I very much agree. We are living in a new era, and I am not sure it that is better or worse.

              You are right about the art part, and perhaps that is why it has taken us so long to understand. Warmest regards, Doc.

            • At 2008.07.20 08:23, rog99 said:

              This is a Great Article…

              It’s Posted at my Blog

              Thanks

              Have Wonderful Day, Roger Bail

              Medication Poisoning
              http://medicationpoisoning.blogspot.com/

              • At 2008.07.20 08:49, Kate Petersen said:

                Roger, thank you for the link back to Politicook.net. Would you please also add a byline at the top that shows that the article was written and is copyrighted by Translator?

                Thank you,

                Kate Petersen, Politicook.net administrator

                • At 2008.07.20 10:10, rog99 said:

                  Hi Kate..,

                  I made the modification !

                  See if it’s o.k. with You

                  Regards, Roger

                  Medication Poisoning
                  http://medicationpoisoning.blogspot.com/

                  • At 2008.07.20 10:38, Kate Petersen said:

                    Thanks! Looks great. And welcome aboard!

                    • At 2008.07.20 19:34, Translator said:

                      Thanks to the both of you for getting this some exposure whilst protecting my interests. As soon as I take care of some beginning of the week stuff here (taking out rubbish, loading dishwasher, you know, important stuff) will check out rog99’s blog. Welcome here, rog99. Warmest regards, Doc.

              You must be logged in to post a comment.