Ah, the joys of Saturday morning and waking long after sunrise, despite my best intentions. But I’m on my second cup now, albeit the sleep’s still in my eyes, and I got a topic I’m hankering to talk about.
Someday I’ll really make a go of this topic, too. For now, though, maybe I’ll think of this as my first rough draft.
Here’s the thing: one of the challenges of my job is working with so many people whose first language isn’t English, Spanish, French or any of the other Indo-European languages. Because, you see, I don’t care what anyone says or what any study’s found — your first language *does* shape the way you think, and once you work with people outside of the Indo-European pantheon of noun noun noun object object object thing thing thing, it becomes painfully obvious what a difference it makes.
And it becomes apparent that English is the language of commerce, while so many others really are encapsulations of the laws of physics and chemistry, commerce be damned.
Take the case of my native speaking Cherokee student who couldn’t understand the directions on a package of Emergen-C. It wasn’t a matter of her lack of English skills — it was her head, her deepest most intuitive understanding of the location of objects in relationship to one another, not to mention, the respect or disrespect paid to those objects and to the actions to which those objects are subjected, and whether it’s morning, noon, evening, night or sometime in between, and is this a serial action or one that occurs once and is then repeated using the same objects and materials over and over and over again?
In other words “do you mean I take the same glass and drink it four times or do I take the package and keep putting more packages in it or do I … ”
This went on and on until the lightbulb suddenly went off over my head, and I belted out “Your first language is Cherokee, isn’t it?” There was a puzzled nod, to which I responded by banging my head on the desk.
Of course. We English – or Spanish – speakers are much too vague and “commercial” for a mind that’s grown up with the specificities carefully spelled out, down to the exact time of year and whether the seasons are behaving correctly and even whether that guy over there who really has nothing to do with anything at all, whether he quite approves of what’s going on.
So I grubbed around until I found four glasses and explained that it’s four glasses, although you can r-use the same glass, no problem, filled at separate time of the day, but one at a time, and a packet added each time.
This is what I do all day.
So much more to say about this. But breakfast is done.
5 Comments
Extremely important knowledge about how our language defines our reality. I read about a discussion some very well know physicists of the modern age where having about how the Native American mind perceives reality as a continuum of interconnected processes whereas the European mind is obsessed with the speed mass and trajectory of objects. Would that have anything to do with a culture engrossed in perpetual warfare over thousands of years?
In you have any other resources you could relate on this subject I would greatly appreciate it.
rohaan@mac.com
I have tons on it, but it will take me a while. I’m not sure what I have on this computer, but I have stacks of it here in boxes and in other hard drives.
And, yes, there is nothing like a physicist or a student of physics who discovers a Native American language.
I’m more knowledgeable about Navajo thinking processes, but I find a lot of quantum mechanical thought. And maybe because of that, though cause and effect might be blurred here, a connection with taoism.
From there it is a short step to Winnie the Pooh, opf course.
quantum mechanical thought galore, and more.
there’s some interesting stuff concerning the collapsing of space and time, as well, and some theories that that kinds of encoded knowledge was so powerful that the early Christians had to demolish it – thus our binary ways of being – but that will have to wait …
Biscuit,
A fascinating subject that gets down to the basics of “how do we really interact?”
I did a paper in college about two children, the boy lived 6 years with a wolf pack. Yes, really, I’ve seen the research and a girl who was raised in a chicken coop with chickens by two spinster women that didn’t want anyone to know about the girl. That one still haunts my dreams. One of my friends has done research into the theory that if a child is not given love and affection before 3 YEARS OLD they are lost forever. No way to find a sense of fairplay or empathy for another human. The wolf boy and chicken girl could not progress thru language and eventually reverted to mostly gestures and sounds. They lived in institutions until their deaths.
You must be logged in to post a comment.